ozmujaheed wrote:Simple maths the previous owner gets the same area but who profits from the rest of the flats sold in 40 storey tower
porus wrote:I have some questions regarding owning and renting apartments (flats) in Mumbai and other metro areas in India.
porus wrote:I know several people now residing in the USA who visited Mumbai to sell their 'houses'. It turned out that it wasn't their houses but their flats. They did not own the flats but 'owned' tenancy for which they paid rent. The tenancy fetches a price which is called 'pagri' (પાઘડી). The price is shared between the owner of the flat and the current tenant.
porus wrote:Thus, would it be correct to say that the majority of Bohras who lived in Bhindi Bazaar 'exchanged' their tenancy agreement for a new tenancy agreement with the developers who bought the land and tenancy agreements from the original owners of the land and buildings?
porus wrote:Presumably, the new tenancy agreement entitles them to a 350 sq ft flat in the new development but at what rent?
porus wrote:Is the buying and selling of 'tenancy agreements' governed and enforced by law in India?
The tenants will get 350sq ft flats but they will not be paying any rent because the new buildings which will be constructed will be on 'ownership basis' and not 'tenancy' i.e. a society will be formed which will consist of all the flat owners of the said building and the flat owners will then pay 'maintainence charges' to the society and not 'rent', the said charges will be fixed by the society members. When someone sells the flat then he doesnt have to pay 33% like before but only the nominal transfer charges as prescribed by the society. Moreover the proceeds will be by way of cheques and not cash i.e. it will be a legal and official sale.
ghulam muhammed wrote:
The houses which your friends had were given on rent (which must be a small paltry sum) by the landlord for which the landlord issued 'rent reciepts', hence the ownership lies with the landlord but then too it is not easy for the landlord to vacate the tenant due to the 'rent act' because the value of the flat was already paid to the landlord in cash for which there is obviously no reciept.
ghulam muhammed wrote:
The tenants will get 350sq ft flats but they will not be paying any rent because the new buildings which will be constructed will be on 'ownership basis' and not 'tenancy' i.e. a society will be formed which will consist of all the flat owners of the said building and the flat owners will then pay 'maintainence charges' to the society and not 'rent', the said charges will be fixed by the society members. When someone sells the flat then he doesnt have to pay 33% like before but only the nominal transfer charges as prescribed by the society. Moreover the proceeds will be by way of cheques and not cash i.e. it will be a legal and official sale.
porus wrote:In the underlined sentence above, is the "value of the flat already paid" same as 'pagri'? If so, the landlord/owner gets the initial full 'pagri' when he rents out a new flat and 33% pagri for any subsequent transfer of tenancy. Thus it is in the interest of the owner to encourage rapid turnover of tenants!
porus wrote:So, the new tenancy agreement is that the renters have exchanged the right to a 66% pagri on future sale with the right to remain rent-free in the new flat, (although a maintenance charge is substituted for rent!). Doesn't that take away their ability to fund a purchase of a new agreement somewhere away from Bhindi Bazaar? Won't they be 'prisoners' in the flat? Looks like a bad deal!
ghulam muhammed wrote: As regards the tenants, they are in a much better position now because their old houses and the dilapitated buildings will be replaced with proper high rises with elevators and the flats will be 'owned' by them as the new buildings will be on ownership basis. Moreover the value of their flats will also increase substantially due to ownership and a new construction.
Hozefa wrote:Highlights
Investment : 1500 Cr
786,000 Total area in Sqft
386,000 Open area for roads and greens in Sqft
400,000 Net foot prints area for buildings in Sqft
3 to 25 average floors heights
6,000,000 Gross Built up area in Sqft
5,000,000 Nett build up area in Sqft
2,000,000 Building area in Sqft to be reserved for old tenants [Res. + Comm]
3,000,000 Building area in Sqft to be sold in market rate [Res. + Comm]
7,860 Average market rate [Res. + Comm]
25,000,000,000/- [Rs. 2500 Cr.] Nett Revenue
Expenses:-
Rs. 1000 Cr. Construction Cost for Buildings
Rs. 300 Cr. Construction Cost for Infrastructure / Road and services / Parking
Rs. 250 Cr. Design + Operational Cost
Rs. 200 Cr. Taxes and Govt. Authority
Rs. 50 Cr. To be reserved for maintenance
Rs. 250 Cr. To be reserved for future expansion
Rs. 200 Cr. reserve for contingencies
Rs. 100 Cr. for temporary residence facility and compensation of business loss to existing tenants
Balance Rs. 150 Cr. Will be reserved for funds
ghulam muhammed wrote:The 'renters' i.e. the landlords of the buildings normally do not stay in the same building as all the flats are sold out or given on pagri. In this bhendi bazaar project the landlords (building owners) were paid on an average of more then a crore for their buildings which is definately much higher then the amount of rent that they recieved even for 20 years. As regards the tenants, they are in a much better position now because their old houses and the dilapitated buildings will be replaced with proper high rises with elevators and the flats will be 'owned' by them as the new buildings will be on ownership basis. Moreover the value of their flats will also increase substantially due to ownership and a new construction.
Aymelek wrote:
What I have been hearing is that as per the underlying agreement between Bohra tenants and SBUT (Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust), these flats (i.e., once the construction is completed and possession given) cannot be sold out by the occupants, instead if they wish to vacate it they will have to approach the Trust or such other body which may be created (basically Kothar) and Kothar will repossess the unit at a price fixed by them.
porus wrote:I think you wrote 'owner' in quotes advisedly. From what you wrote I understand that the Developers, perhaps Saifee-Burhani Upliftment Trust (SBUT), bought the land and buildings from the original owners and they are the new owners of the land and the buildings that will be built upon them.
porus wrote:But how do the tenants become owners? Is their ownership legal? You are saying that they can sell the 'flat' with small transfer fee to Developers? Why, if they are the owners?
Aymelek wrote:What I have been hearing is that as per the underlying agreement between Bohra tenants and SBUT (Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust), these flats (i.e., once the construction is completed and possession given) cannot be sold out by the occupants, instead if they wish to vacate it they will have to approach the Trust or such other body which may be created (basically Kothar) and Kothar will repossess the unit at a price fixed by them.
khidmatguzar wrote:3,000,000 Building area in Sqft to be sold in market rate [Res. + Comm]
7,860 Average market rate [Res. + Comm]
25,000,000,000/- [Rs. 2500 Cr.] Nett Revenue
S. Insaf wrote:Please see the article in today's Times of India regarding 17-storeyed Burhani Heights:
http://www.mumbaimirror.com/index.aspx?page=article§id=2&contentid=201107242011072404263338432b9e998
S. Insaf wrote:Dear brother aqs,
The construction of 17-storeyed Burhani Heights was taken up just three years back, see the photo all 17- stories are constructed and internal construction is going on. Now the new plan of SBUT shows a road going through at that place and the trust wants to now demolish this high-rise building.
Do you justify this huge waste and harassment of the original residents by a person who is on the seat of mercy and who claims to be a well-wisher of the humanity?
Do you justify this huge waste and harassment of the original residents by a person who is on the seat of mercy and who claims to be a well-wisher of the humanity?
S. Insaf wrote:Dear brother aqs,
The construction of 17-storeyed Burhani Heights was taken up just three years back, see the photo all 17- stories are constructed and internal construction is going on. Now the new plan of SBUT shows a road going through at that place and the trust wants to now demolish this high-rise building.
Do you justify this huge waste and harassment of the original residents by a person who is on the seat of mercy and who claims to be a well-wisher of the humanity?
ghulam muhammed wrote:The above is a GROSS MISCALCULATION and an attempt to hoodwink the bohras. The current going rate in areas like mazgaon and byculla is around Rs.20,000/- per sq ft for residential flats, the commercial property is sold at almost twice these rates. Needless to say that the exhorbitant rates are due to the great demand by bohras, the sole reason being its close proximity to bohri mohalla, raudat tahera, saifee masjid. Hence if plush highrises are constructed in the bohri mohalla itself then its anyones guess as to the price it will command which definately will be much higher then mazgaon and byculla. On a conservative side the flats will be sold at not less then Rs.30,000/- per sq ft and commercial property @ double the price. To give youll a recent example........ A tiny pan shop at Pakmodia street, was reportedly sold for a whooping Rs.27 lacs and that too a couple of years back. The shop is hardly 150 sq ft.
Hence if we take into account only the residential part then it comes to 30,00,000 x 20,000 = Rs.9,000 crores !!!!!!