badrijanab wrote:Has Allah or his Prophet s.a.w.w. authorised Aurangzeb to take decisions in religious matters? No. Hence, Aurangzeb is guilty like any other murderor. And murderor is awarded punishment not praises. So those who praises Aurangzeb for him murdering those who keep different religious view are religiously fools, brain-washed and unintelligent.shehzaada wrote:These are all concocted lies , why would a person of Aurangzeb rah. stature would meddle with the obscure Bohra , unless they commit open blasphemies? I am sure that even if Aurangzeb rah. ordered the execution than there has to be serious and proven charges against Qutubuddin. There is a strong reason behind all such strong events. Like Sarmad claimed divinity hence was executed.
Murderor Aurangzeb is no different than any other terrorist like terrorist belonging to Lashkar-Jhangwi or LTTE or RSS / Bajrang Dal Hindu terrorist!
BJ I understand your position of faith , but what I am looking for is historical records to explain some potentially unusual differences of dates, his motivations, and natural sequence of events.
As I said in 1646 a 27 year old governor would be extremely psychopathic to selectively pick a minority leader ...and then when history says he becomes intolerant he picks on his real targets.
Is this a case we have blamed him for something he was only indirectly responsible since he was the governor at time and any administrative issue is his fault....
Yet contradictory is we protect our leaders from direct responsibility for evils during their eras.
Don't get me wrong Aurangzeb may be guilty of other crimes ...but is he personally guilty of crimes against Bohras?