Brave Molana Qutbuddin Shaeed v/s coward Burhanuddin

The one and only free public forum for Bohras. The focus of this forum is the reform movement, the Dawoodi Bohra faith and, of course, the corrupt priesthood. But the discussion is in no way restricted to the Bohras alone.
Mubarak
Posts: 471
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 4:01 am

Brave Molana Qutbuddin Shaeed v/s coward Burhanuddin

#1

Unread post by Mubarak » Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:39 am

In the parliament of Sunni king Aurangzeb (lanat) Molana Qutubuddin (r.a.) said without fair of death award that we are on Sunnat of Prophet Moahmmed (s.a.) and you are not, if you want to kill me then kill but I will not change my statement fearing death award.

Burhanuddin unlike Molana Qutbuddin (r.a.) cowardly ran away from Bohri Mohalla, Bombay and fearing for his life he tendered apologies to Sunni's!!!

Litmus test for being a true Fatimi Dawat officer: Molan Qutbuddin (r.a.) in fear of death did not change his statements whereas materialistic leader Burhanuddin did. Thus, Burhanuddin is not true Fatimi Dawat officer.

In the multimedia section of this website Burhanuddin apology is present for anyone reference.

fisherman
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:44 am

Re: Brave Molana Qutbuddin Shaeed v/s coward Burhanuddin

#2

Unread post by fisherman » Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:01 am

Imam hassan(a.s) did agreement with muaviyaw would u consider him coward(naudobillah) read history of islaam and then bring up with statements.what ever hazir imam or Dai does is HAQ.

Mubarak
Posts: 471
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 4:01 am

Re: Brave Molana Qutbuddin Shaeed v/s coward Burhanuddin

#3

Unread post by Mubarak » Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:17 am

fisherman wrote:Imam hassan(a.s) did agreement with muaviyaw would u consider him coward(naudobillah) read history of islaam and then bring up with statements.what ever hazir imam or Dai does is HAQ.
Fish Ji,

"Sar dad na dad dar dast a Yazeed"

There is DIFFERENCE between entering an agreement and changing statements.

Imam Hasan (a.s.) never changed his statement though he did 'Yudh Viram' with Maviya. Imam Hasan (a.s.) statement was he is the Imam and successor of Mola Ali (a.s.) and he sticked on it and in the agreement same point was mentioned and signed by Maviya and Imam Hasan and also former pledged to give state headship to Imam Hasan after Maviya death.

Molana Qutbuddin (r.a.) accepted death sentence but not changed his statement fearing death.

Burhanuddin saheb fearing death cowardly changed his statement and tendered recorded apology - Burhanuddin saheb is point of shame in past 1400 years of Fatimi Dawat.

Hades
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:48 am

Re: Brave Molana Qutbuddin Shaeed v/s coward Burhanuddin

#4

Unread post by Hades » Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:11 pm

Mubarak wrote:
fisherman wrote:Imam hassan(a.s) did agreement with muaviyaw would u consider him coward(naudobillah) read history of islaam and then bring up with statements.what ever hazir imam or Dai does is HAQ.
Fish Ji,

"Sar dad na dad dar dast a Yazeed"

There is DIFFERENCE between entering an agreement and changing statements.

Imam Hasan (a.s.) never changed his statement though he did 'Yudh Viram' with Maviya. Imam Hasan (a.s.) statement was he is the Imam and successor of Mola Ali (a.s.) and he sticked on it and in the agreement same point was mentioned and signed by Maviya and Imam Hasan and also former pledged to give state headship to Imam Hasan after Maviya death.

Molana Qutbuddin (r.a.) accepted death sentence but not changed his statement fearing death.

Burhanuddin saheb fearing death cowardly changed his statement and tendered recorded apology - Burhanuddin saheb is point of shame in past 1400 years of Fatimi Dawat.
Are you talking about the first video in that section ??

If yes , then I with broken understanding of Urdu/Hindi and with full understanding of the written text ( English ) along with people having a brain can see that the statement was issued because the Sunnis were rioting in the city ... The Sunnis are too touchy innit ?? For them to go rioting around and causing havoc to people of the city.... That statement was made for the protection of the Dawoodi Bohras from the Hooliganism of Sunnis... Don't you think ?? And as you think you are a Dawoodi Bohra you should be grateful that you were given protection because of this very statement.... :wink: