Prophet Mohammed s.a.w.w. was the ruler of his time and when he will pass away his position (as a ruler = Prophet assets) will be inherited by his only surviving daughter / daughter's son. And not to his father in law! This is the rule practiced always in past and is practiced now in ever country.
Bohhra mumineen went with Prophet Mohammed s.a.w.w. son-in-law, so does "haq" as on Gadeer-a-Khum Prophet Mohammed s.a.w.w. declared haq will trail Mola Ali a.s.
Others went with father-in-law. Only one question to these "others" - if you are survived with only daughter, then your assets will be inherited by whom - your father in law or your daughter?
So Imam Hasan a.s. / Mola Ali a.s. should be the ruler after Prophet Mohammed s.a.w.w. but that was not the case - it means their right was usurped!
Bohras went with son-in-law so does the haq
-
badrijanab
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 3:19 pm
Bohras went with son-in-law so does the haq
Last edited by badrijanab on Thu May 30, 2013 11:06 am, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Bohras went with son-in-law so does the haq
Islam isn't an "asset" to be inherited. You could've come up with a better argument than that. Admin, I suggest to move this to Islam Today.
Re: Bohras went with son-in-law so does the haq
What logic can be expected from some one, who consider Prophet as ruler and Islam as asset.
Re: Bohras went with son-in-law so does the haq
The sixties and the seventies was the age of record players, juke boxes and records. And the most famous among the records was the HMV ( His Master's Voice)which was supposed to be very tikaao . So is brother BJ's record - Yeh na kabhi ghisegi na pitegi, bus ek hi jagah pe atki rahegi aur bajti rahegi, bajti rahegi.