Categories: reform_issues
      Date: January 10, 2008
     Title: Code of conduct for the Dai
The Fatimid Khalifas have on various occasions declared that they are ordained to protect the Shariat. They were not Sahib-al-Shariat, and did not have the authority to make Shariat. Hence, what must one think of a Dai claiming to be over and above the Imams.

Had the Dais been equal in status and in no way subordinate, then the Imams would not have laid down the qualifications and conditions for their behavior, conduct etc. This conclusion can best be drawn by what is stated in the “Risaals-tul-Mujizat-al-Kafia”, written by the Dai Ahmed Bin Ebrahim Nayshapuri of the time of the 8th Fatimi Khalifa (Eighteenth Imam) Al-Mustansir Billah (H. 487/A.D. 1094).

To prove that this "code" is also applicable during the period of seclusion of the Imam it is quoted in “Tahfatul Quloob” by the third Dai-Al-Mutlaq Hatim Bin Erahim Al Hamidi (H. 596/A.D.1199) in Yemen and further quoted in India by Sayyedi Hassan Bin Nuh (Ustad of Sayedna Yusuf Najmuddin) (H. 939/A.D.1533) in the second volume of his “Kitab-al-Azhar”). Thus we have an unbroken tradition - from Fatimid Egypt right down to Yemen and India - of laying down the code of conduct for the Dai.

There are in all 94 qualifications detailed in 94-paras in the “Risaals”. Some of these qualificatons are abstracted below:

If a Dai doesn't possess the above mentioned qualities in reality and is called Dai, then he is a Dai in name only without any meaning. It is useless to hope for any spiritual benefits from such a Dai. The assumption of the name of Dai, for such a Dai is a sin and it is a sort of burden over him.

From the above conditions and qualifications it is plain that the Dai is required to be very careful in conducting himself in regard to the essential tenets of Islam, then only he could be in a position to preach others to follow the tenets of Islam.