It is clear that both Haggun Nafs and guy-sam2005 do not understand the arguments that have been put forward here. And they resort to their stock-in-trade device which is to accuse their opponents of the 'sin of unbelief', a cultish behavior.guy_sam2005 wrote: according to you who is the authorised guardian of the faith...you or moula(tus).
do you accept him as dai or not.or a dai as per your rule book...dont gimme a complicated web.just a simple yes or no
Which faith is the moula guardian of? Is it Islam? Then why is it that he violates some parts of the Quran?
I do not know if preventing Bohras for going to Makka or Madina by Sayedna was under Saudi pressure. But, this must be the first time in history that someone has prevented Muslims from going there.
Whether it was a Saudi decision or Sayedna's decision, the logic behind the decision is clear enough. Bohras would not be going there to pay their respects to the Kaaba or the Prophet but for adoration of their moula. That would be unIslamic and both Saudis and Sayedna know this. And yet, this behavior of the Bohras persists outside the Haramain.
A guardian of Islam would be welcomed with open arms by all Muslims but this appears not to be the case with Sayedna. At least, they believe that he is not the guardian of their faith. And they include most Muslims including the Ithna-ashari Shia.